Tuesday, February 15, 2011
Tuesday, February 8, 2011
Like a carrot, you are a tap root, in NZ English.
[needs editing]
I used to talk about “The Gremlins.” It was my way of saying two, three things, which can be figured Seuss-instructionally “inside outside upside down.” From here will have to be another post, (1) I have forgotten, (2) I want to swim at the Z-Center while I am visiting MIT, (3) I have to deal with students!
This will have a high specific gravity. CAVEAT LECTOR. As if being the scribe wasn’t bad enough. I am trying to work out when I first started noticing discrepancies. They are made up by me of just observations.
(1) Bad printing alignment, color matching, and alpha-channel cross-talk by other colors: some, not I, speak forthrightly about such undesirability! Like, inscrutable—difficult to understand, impenetrable—um, is Adriana Lima an accident/undersirable/or wholly acceptable? Arbeit—er?—freely made decisions, I hope because the initial nice sounds of a tryptophan tastic Tunisia, triptych of temples—Sbeitla—Sb, I have no Antimony which is fairly poisonous, used in liquid metal batteries being developed at MIT, sounds like some unkind of dislike, and Kant had four of them
(3) In film I suppose subtle time adjustment, jitter and dither control, angle adjustment (in Final Cut the instructive DVD uses Angelina Jolie, so it would be angel adjustment), directedness of action, and sound “trickcraft” as it is known in the profession.
(2) There is no two.
This is all to say, the following DOES make a lot of sense when you put two minds to the task.
I thought Amf. had written about Lewontin and Gould’s article on Spandrels, but I have them in my notes. I’ll post them next. For now, we learn about Spolia, which is close to “spoils”—generally columns taken from diverse sources and put within a single structure; for me Basilica di S. Stefano Rot_ndo al Monte Celio springs to mind. I have spent many hours at the tiny circular (no, it’s not fat) church just above the Amphitheatrum Flavium in Rome, quite close to the palimpsestual Basilica di S. Clemente al Laterano, which is my favorite church in Rome itself (okay S. Ivo [alla Sapienza, the former location of L’università di Roma, now within the confines of Gli archivi di Stato] of Frencesco Borromini comes close, as does Il Tempietto di S. Pietro in Montorio of Donato Bramente, Il mausoleo di Santa Costanza [a S. Agnese fuori le Mura]—the photo on Wikipedia is—may I dither a response to this monstrously pathetic representation—truly fcuked up), which Father Leonard Boyle, former Librarian of the BAV—Biblioteca Apistolica Vaticana, as an amazing archaeologist, mapped in a veritable palimpsestual book, with layers of (architectural) vellum for the various layers of the church, right down to the Mithreaum and the sacrificial alter—one of my favored subjects these days. The Wikipedia article on S. Clemente doesn’t even mention Father Boyle. He was, dicitur, removed from his job as librarian by JPdue just before his [LB’s] retirement, as all his predecessors were made Cardinals. In such a way, the pope, who had, dicitur, difficulties with Father Boyle’s policies such as hiring women, could guarantee that the Irish-Canadian, later to be buried at S. Clemente, would never have a voice at the Vatican. Unlike Bernard Law—no elaboration, q.v., quiver, go figure, brrrr.
I must write one day about the truly great Father Reginaldus Foster. But another, logical post.
Dale Kinney, “Roman Architectural Spolia, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 145/2 (2001)
[This continues, and starts, very interestingly. I kept in the footnotes in case they are a secret signal to passing UFOs, rather like the tune in Close Encounters of the Third Kind]
Now for this. Best snope this: [nyc.gif]
[Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mayhem_(crime) on 20110208-1914]
Fetter v. Beall
The most significant revolution in common-law mayhem doctrine came in 1697, when the King's Bench decided Fetter v. Beale, 91 Eng. Rep. 1122. There, the plaintiff recovered in a battery action against a defendant. Shortly thereafter, “part of his skull by reason of the said battery came out of his head,” and the plaintiff brought a subsequent action under mayhem. Though Fetter is also known as an early example of res judicata, it is most significant for expanding the ambit of mayhem to include “loss of the skull.”
[Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ragging on 20110208-1918]
I call this mind-rape, just one form of it, anyway. It really and truly is criminal, unconscionable, and it happens. Not sure if res judicata, as obvious as it might seem, is especially fair.
Ragging
Ragging is a practice in educational institutions in India and Sri Lanka that involves existing students baiting or bullying new students. It is similar to the American phenomenon of hazing. It often takes a malignant form wherein the newcomers may be subjected to psychological or physical torture. Currently, Sri Lanka is said to be the worst affected country in the world.
Recent cases
Since 2001, ragging has been the focus of a number of legal actions. For example, the Supreme Court of India defined it in a judgement as actions that "adversely affect the physique or psyche of a fresher or a junior student".
A report from 2007 by the Indian anti-ragging group Coalition to Uproot Ragging from Education analyzed 64 ragging complaints, and found that over 60% of these were related to physical ragging, and 20% were sexual in nature.
[I have removed footnote references in the hope that this is rendered less conforming to any particular code of publishing conduct, just because i’m a rebel.]
Another reference for which I couldn’t think of a tag to give to it.
[I would read that, more than just this, weighing in all the details also of the the following cadence/coda/cadenza/credenza/credentials (a falling, tail, falling, place for writing, things to have someone believe you are in fact you)]
[Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boys_are_stupid,_throw_rocks_at_them! on 20110208-1935]
On misandry:–
Why do I somewhat agree with a man I have always despised? I don’t think I’m drifting to the right, more to the left-right-out because history possibly will swerve in the near future to a hell unknown that takes us back to I don’t want to know but it is perhaps a minor fear, some form of Medieval or medium-evil Devo “Whip It” goshdarn it I can’t really speak of such things. (Because writing is privileged over its binary opposite, speech, according to Derrida, upending Rousseau, but not eliminating the category. The word upend is peculiar: it is like U-Haul. U-Pend. Patent pend? Patient pend? Pending what, depending on what, defending what, deafening whom, offending whom, offensive forcing whom, certainly not sitting on the fence with Hume, too much spending—I hear as a complaint on a day on which $1.1tr of cuts were made—pend, mend, send, bend, it’s gonna be the end. Incend.0 SO MORE ON THIS:
As a 16yo I stayed after English class (5th form = American 10th grade) to be a giant unpoetic math-like dork with Geoff Shepherd, an incredibly good English teacher, new to our school. He was a thespian, good looking, spoke very nicely, held our attention, and we largely responded. I started doing all the lighting design and ladder climbing for school productions. That is by-the-by. I asked him if he knew of any sentences like the one I am about to write, which I gave him. It had to be seen. Perhaps now, heard, but then, seen. He said, no, he prefers the Romantic poets. The sentence, in its second, slightly more sensible form, really does apply these days (said my bruised head, and my right big toe—at least it was the right that was crushed, and fell off, I mean, the toe nail, after a good beating): “Go to the ranger’s tops.” I was thinking of a Park Ranger, like one tending Mt. Tongariro, one of NZ’s wonderful volcanoes. I said, if you shift the spaces, like “together” becomes “to get her,” the sentence becomes “Got other anger stops?” Poignant. Dorky.
I just notice the word upend: “word upend”⟶“wor dupend” which is dripping with possibilities. “was/war/we’re/warped depend/deepened/duped/end,” and I can’t but help feeling the word “puella” there, but I’m single, and beautiful/pretty in the feminine (Classical and Modern Latin) is somewhat not unappealing. But the puella come from nowhere, except for the first line of Ovid’s “Pyramus and Thisbe” from his first book of Metamorphoses. Nothing to fight for or upend, but just remembering my past, which was sweeter than this vile present. Well, it isn’t really THE present, it is MY present. NO, wrong way around. The past, I was in my little world. I was nice, despite some very bad character traits. Innocent too (same contradiction applies). I wake from this happy slumber (okay, the slumber itself was dreadful, foreboding, cruel) of forced insanity, true: I was forcibly made to feel (and subsequently go a little) mad. Only my imaginings were REAL!! How unfair is that. And of course, since it is real, it persists. Yuck, IHTFP. The people up North-East at MIT have those letters to mean, ostensibly, I Hate This Fcuking Place. Knowing these clever students, it is probably a chemical formula, possibly just baking soda. Hacking too, a funny thing. People don’t waste their time. No one learns Morse Code for the heck of it, or scrapes body parts pretty bad just to tag their name in an abandoned room somewhere. But I secretly (oops! no longer a secret) wish I had done all those things, the pipes, the careful planning, the moving of parts, say, of a firetruck (which had Latin on it which is extremely cool), yes, piece by piece, then assembled on the Dome of MIT. I have been to a couple of places, but that was pretty basic. That is where I took the photo, either here or on Tumblr, of “The Head Phone Tomb.” Everything has a name, except some people have a number. Says No.6, “I am not a number, I am a free man.” Then Rover, the big white ball—in fact a weather balloon, “when the balloon goes up” is a weird expression I heard lately, perhaps 99 red ones? That was the 1980s, bounces on him, arise from the sea which in this case isn’t a metaphor.
Amazing, and I wish my screen wouldn’t flash at me whenever I write something about MIT or conspiracies or theories of kerning or when I quote the NY Times (which I very much like, just read about Google searches being “black-hat” stacked by J.C. Penney), or I put up one of my compositions or videos, or paintings/drawings especially, or comments about how I believe that, well, I leave that remark involving the words, not connected, alpha, www fora, trees, lights (what about xmas?), lyrics, books, and anything having a shred to do with anything I have been doing all my life, to which I have some propriety relationship: my ideas! My output! Is identity theft going on by proxy, by taking everything from me? By causing enough despair for me to willingly give things up? I think not. I don’t have fears, a strange brain-chemistry thing, oh very strange brain, oh very strange chemistry, che misterioso. Basically playing music, then composing it, analyzing it, teaching it including time and frequency domain, writing words of many means but nothing especially orthographic though I am font-obsessed and did have a Letraset font catalog which I read obsessively and it was just the alphabet! Mind you, for transfer-stencils, as a kid, and designed fonts at the age of 10, and was Greek/Norse/Egyptian myth-obsessed, and I had The World Atlas of Mysteries with an awful photo of Spontaneous Human Combustion leaving a Zimmer frame and shoe after the person immolated, I write about representation, I was involved in the editing of my ex-girlfriend Cammy Brothers’ dissertation and book on Renaissance architectural sketches of ruins and built/unbuilt works by the architects, and worked on formal music theory with the greatest modern music theorist David Lewin at Harvard where we spend half our time rotating and inverting and retrograding strings of notes, using Markov chains, infinite and finite string systems, dovetailing, counting intervals, duplicating notes as singularities (BEFORE the recent spate of them), and studying ways of understanding, semantically, difficult but seemingly obvious texts (and his book on the subject was published, finally, posthumously) and that involved excising parts of the music kind of hypermetrically in the sense, loosely speaking, of Cone, Lerdahl and Jackendoff (I am being very generalizing here), etc. I work on representation of transformational voice leading between two sets, basically a critique of current ideas on the subject, their metaphors, which makes the heating pipe very unhappy with me (yes, a metaphor, and metonymy and metaphor are major parts of my dissertation). I like everything to be in words. Able to be spoken, heard as-is.
So, yes, I do all this. And I am about to put up a couple of videos. I don’t know how well they will be received, but here goes nothing.
[The following from a good sort!]
._. ._. ._. ._. ._. ._. ._. ._. ._. ._. ._. ._. ._. ._. ._. ._. ._. ._. ._. ._. ._. ._. ._. ._. ._.
Those are amphibrachs. But feet. Meter.
Leonard Cohen’s own liner notes:–
I had a good raincoat then, a Burberry I got in London in 1959. Elizabeth thought I looked like a spider in it. That was probably why she wouldn’t go to Greece with me. It hung more heroically when I took out the lining, and achieved glory when the frayed sleeves were repaired with a little leather. Things were clear. I knew how to dress in those days. It was stolen from Marianne’s loft in New York sometime during the early seventies. I wasn't wearing it very much toward the end.
According to Wikipedia: In the 1999 book, The Complete Guide to the Music of Leonard Cohen, the authors comment that Cohen’s question, “Did you ever go clear?”, in the song, is a reference to the Scientology state of “Clear.” Cohen was very briefly a member of the Church of Scientology, which he had heard was a “good place to meet women.”
And, “why not?”
Check out www.songmeanings.net for some Revelations. [Bad guise!] Also find P’s “Wild-blue-inland-kid-intimacy” which is on one of our main blogs. [The words of a great man!] To swing the other way completely, read about what is accidentally celebrated (no, I mean wesentlich/Anfall, not zufällig) in Wikipedia, on the swastika. I simply cannot reproduce the postcard here because it is so vile, and freedom of speech referring to something before it apparently became evil and vile but with an implicit grope to it as there is in the article on eugenics, is not warranted other than for a reasonable rest.
This will continue later; I have a bACKlog of things to get through. SpAeter.
I used to talk about “The Gremlins.” It was my way of saying two, three things, which can be figured Seuss-instructionally “inside outside upside down.” From here will have to be another post, (1) I have forgotten, (2) I want to swim at the Z-Center while I am visiting MIT, (3) I have to deal with students!
This will have a high specific gravity. CAVEAT LECTOR. As if being the scribe wasn’t bad enough. I am trying to work out when I first started noticing discrepancies. They are made up by me of just observations.
(1) Bad printing alignment, color matching, and alpha-channel cross-talk by other colors: some, not I, speak forthrightly about such undesirability! Like, inscrutable—difficult to understand, impenetrable—um, is Adriana Lima an accident/undersirable/or wholly acceptable? Arbeit—er?—freely made decisions, I hope because the initial nice sounds of a tryptophan tastic Tunisia, triptych of temples—Sbeitla—Sb, I have no Antimony which is fairly poisonous, used in liquid metal batteries being developed at MIT, sounds like some unkind of dislike, and Kant had four of them
(3) In film I suppose subtle time adjustment, jitter and dither control, angle adjustment (in Final Cut the instructive DVD uses Angelina Jolie, so it would be angel adjustment), directedness of action, and sound “trickcraft” as it is known in the profession.
(2) There is no two.
This is all to say, the following DOES make a lot of sense when you put two minds to the task.
I thought Amf. had written about Lewontin and Gould’s article on Spandrels, but I have them in my notes. I’ll post them next. For now, we learn about Spolia, which is close to “spoils”—generally columns taken from diverse sources and put within a single structure; for me Basilica di S. Stefano Rot_ndo al Monte Celio springs to mind. I have spent many hours at the tiny circular (no, it’s not fat) church just above the Amphitheatrum Flavium in Rome, quite close to the palimpsestual Basilica di S. Clemente al Laterano, which is my favorite church in Rome itself (okay S. Ivo [alla Sapienza, the former location of L’università di Roma, now within the confines of Gli archivi di Stato] of Frencesco Borromini comes close, as does Il Tempietto di S. Pietro in Montorio of Donato Bramente, Il mausoleo di Santa Costanza [a S. Agnese fuori le Mura]—the photo on Wikipedia is—may I dither a response to this monstrously pathetic representation—truly fcuked up), which Father Leonard Boyle, former Librarian of the BAV—Biblioteca Apistolica Vaticana, as an amazing archaeologist, mapped in a veritable palimpsestual book, with layers of (architectural) vellum for the various layers of the church, right down to the Mithreaum and the sacrificial alter—one of my favored subjects these days. The Wikipedia article on S. Clemente doesn’t even mention Father Boyle. He was, dicitur, removed from his job as librarian by JPdue just before his [LB’s] retirement, as all his predecessors were made Cardinals. In such a way, the pope, who had, dicitur, difficulties with Father Boyle’s policies such as hiring women, could guarantee that the Irish-Canadian, later to be buried at S. Clemente, would never have a voice at the Vatican. Unlike Bernard Law—no elaboration, q.v., quiver, go figure, brrrr.
I must write one day about the truly great Father Reginaldus Foster. But another, logical post.
Dale Kinney, “Roman Architectural Spolia, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 145/2 (2001)
I think it may exaggerate the purposefulness of their builders to call them historicist. A truly historicist building would be a “strong” one in tense conversation with its historical sources; and these traditional basilicas—however wonderful for other reasons—are not strong in that way. In Bloom’s terms, the millennial repetition of the architectural idea of the basilica, like the reuse of spolia, “just happened.” Paradoxically, these buildings, which, according to the loose conception of “influence” demonstrated at the beginning of this article, should show Roman influence most strongly, on the “anxious” model show no influence at all....
Disproportionately steep from ground level, the central space looks normal from the raised perspective of the throne, in which the lower story almost disappears and only the upper arches with their two registers of columns are clearly visible.
The columns were proclaimed spolia by Charlemagne’s advisor Einhard, who wrote that Charles “was unable to find marble columns for his construction anywhere else, and so he had them brought from Rome and Ravenna.”31 In fact, a number of the capitals have proven to be Carolingian simulations of spolia, and the authentic spolia did not necessarily come from Rome.32 It is usually assumed that the claim to have acquired spolia from the old imperial capital cities was made for programmatic reasons, to express Charlemagne’s own pretensions to imperial status and grandeur; thus the palatine chapel figures in most discussions of spolia as a paradigm of influence in the normal sense employed by R. R. Bolgar: the “transmission of ideas.”33...
There is no lower story, however, and the columns are disposed on receding semicircular paths between the piers. There are no straight lines like the heavy horizontal cornice or the vertical planes suggested by the rectilinear alignment of the columns at Aachen (Fig. 8). Although the elements are the same and the designs are unmistakably related, the effects of these interior spaces are almost opposing: balanced proportions and serene expansiveness in San Vitale, dominant verticality and stark prismatic constraint at Aachen.35
It is unclear whether the palatine chapel was meant to reprise San Vitale specifically, or whether their resemblance denotes a more generic affiliation with a tradition of centralized buildings associated with emperors and kings.36 Even in the latter case San Vitale remains a conspicuous point of reference, an indubitable source for the Carolingian chapel, as the formal resemblance between them is much closer than one normally finds among medieval buildings. But the spolia are a difference, signaling an area of resistance. The column shafts and capitals in San Vitale were newly made for the sixth-century construction, and the capitals, in particular, are distinctively post-Roman, comprising early Byzantine shapes (impost capitals, folded capitals) and decorative motifs (Sasanian palmettes, vine scrolls, interlace) that are flagrantly unVitruvian. 37 Vitruvius probably was unknown to the architect of San Vitale, but Charlemagne’s advisors knew his treatise well. Einhard puzzled over its “obscure words and names.” 38 Students of Vitruvius would have appreciated the conceit of bringing spolia especially from Rome. They might also have applauded the designer of the chapel for rejecting the qualities that modern architectural historians find Byzantine in San Vitale, notably its curvaceous grace and the hanging effect achieved by dissembling weight and gravity, in order to foster qualities that we consider Roman: solid, static masses, unnecessary height, traditional ornament.39 The spolia are indices of the builder’s intensely retrospective aspiration, in Bloom’s terms, an anxious avoidance of the more immediate traditions of effeminate Byzantine and uncouth Frank.
[This continues, and starts, very interestingly. I kept in the footnotes in case they are a secret signal to passing UFOs, rather like the tune in Close Encounters of the Third Kind]
Now for this. Best snope this: [nyc.gif]
[Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mayhem_(crime) on 20110208-1914]
Fetter v. Beall
The most significant revolution in common-law mayhem doctrine came in 1697, when the King's Bench decided Fetter v. Beale, 91 Eng. Rep. 1122. There, the plaintiff recovered in a battery action against a defendant. Shortly thereafter, “part of his skull by reason of the said battery came out of his head,” and the plaintiff brought a subsequent action under mayhem. Though Fetter is also known as an early example of res judicata, it is most significant for expanding the ambit of mayhem to include “loss of the skull.”
[Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ragging on 20110208-1918]
I call this mind-rape, just one form of it, anyway. It really and truly is criminal, unconscionable, and it happens. Not sure if res judicata, as obvious as it might seem, is especially fair.
Ragging
Ragging is a practice in educational institutions in India and Sri Lanka that involves existing students baiting or bullying new students. It is similar to the American phenomenon of hazing. It often takes a malignant form wherein the newcomers may be subjected to psychological or physical torture. Currently, Sri Lanka is said to be the worst affected country in the world.
Recent cases
Since 2001, ragging has been the focus of a number of legal actions. For example, the Supreme Court of India defined it in a judgement as actions that "adversely affect the physique or psyche of a fresher or a junior student".
A report from 2007 by the Indian anti-ragging group Coalition to Uproot Ragging from Education analyzed 64 ragging complaints, and found that over 60% of these were related to physical ragging, and 20% were sexual in nature.
[I have removed footnote references in the hope that this is rendered less conforming to any particular code of publishing conduct, just because i’m a rebel.]
Another reference for which I couldn’t think of a tag to give to it.
[I would read that, more than just this, weighing in all the details also of the the following cadence/coda/cadenza/credenza/credentials (a falling, tail, falling, place for writing, things to have someone believe you are in fact you)]
[Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boys_are_stupid,_throw_rocks_at_them! on 20110208-1935]
On misandry:–
Can you imagine if a company put out a line of T-shirts that said, ‘Black people are goobers, drop anvils on their heads’ or ‘Homosexuals are stupid, throw rocks at them’? And can you imagine the San Francisco Chronicle doing a story on how cute these T-shirts are?... Turn it around and imagine shirts suggesting the following: ‘Girls lie and will break your heart. Throw rocks at them’ or ‘Little girls are not soft and cuddly, they are mean and vicious and will destroy you.’ Can you imagine a newspaper doing a cute little headline and story on how wonderfully cute little boy fashion has become? I doubt it.
—Rush Limbaugh
Why do I somewhat agree with a man I have always despised? I don’t think I’m drifting to the right, more to the left-right-out because history possibly will swerve in the near future to a hell unknown that takes us back to I don’t want to know but it is perhaps a minor fear, some form of Medieval or medium-evil Devo “Whip It” goshdarn it I can’t really speak of such things. (Because writing is privileged over its binary opposite, speech, according to Derrida, upending Rousseau, but not eliminating the category. The word upend is peculiar: it is like U-Haul. U-Pend. Patent pend? Patient pend? Pending what, depending on what, defending what, deafening whom, offending whom, offensive forcing whom, certainly not sitting on the fence with Hume, too much spending—I hear as a complaint on a day on which $1.1tr of cuts were made—pend, mend, send, bend, it’s gonna be the end. Incend.0 SO MORE ON THIS:
As a 16yo I stayed after English class (5th form = American 10th grade) to be a giant unpoetic math-like dork with Geoff Shepherd, an incredibly good English teacher, new to our school. He was a thespian, good looking, spoke very nicely, held our attention, and we largely responded. I started doing all the lighting design and ladder climbing for school productions. That is by-the-by. I asked him if he knew of any sentences like the one I am about to write, which I gave him. It had to be seen. Perhaps now, heard, but then, seen. He said, no, he prefers the Romantic poets. The sentence, in its second, slightly more sensible form, really does apply these days (said my bruised head, and my right big toe—at least it was the right that was crushed, and fell off, I mean, the toe nail, after a good beating): “Go to the ranger’s tops.” I was thinking of a Park Ranger, like one tending Mt. Tongariro, one of NZ’s wonderful volcanoes. I said, if you shift the spaces, like “together” becomes “to get her,” the sentence becomes “Got other anger stops?” Poignant. Dorky.
I just notice the word upend: “word upend”⟶“wor dupend” which is dripping with possibilities. “was/war/we’re/warped depend/deepened/duped/end,” and I can’t but help feeling the word “puella” there, but I’m single, and beautiful/pretty in the feminine (Classical and Modern Latin) is somewhat not unappealing. But the puella come from nowhere, except for the first line of Ovid’s “Pyramus and Thisbe” from his first book of Metamorphoses. Nothing to fight for or upend, but just remembering my past, which was sweeter than this vile present. Well, it isn’t really THE present, it is MY present. NO, wrong way around. The past, I was in my little world. I was nice, despite some very bad character traits. Innocent too (same contradiction applies). I wake from this happy slumber (okay, the slumber itself was dreadful, foreboding, cruel) of forced insanity, true: I was forcibly made to feel (and subsequently go a little) mad. Only my imaginings were REAL!! How unfair is that. And of course, since it is real, it persists. Yuck, IHTFP. The people up North-East at MIT have those letters to mean, ostensibly, I Hate This Fcuking Place. Knowing these clever students, it is probably a chemical formula, possibly just baking soda. Hacking too, a funny thing. People don’t waste their time. No one learns Morse Code for the heck of it, or scrapes body parts pretty bad just to tag their name in an abandoned room somewhere. But I secretly (oops! no longer a secret) wish I had done all those things, the pipes, the careful planning, the moving of parts, say, of a firetruck (which had Latin on it which is extremely cool), yes, piece by piece, then assembled on the Dome of MIT. I have been to a couple of places, but that was pretty basic. That is where I took the photo, either here or on Tumblr, of “The Head Phone Tomb.” Everything has a name, except some people have a number. Says No.6, “I am not a number, I am a free man.” Then Rover, the big white ball—in fact a weather balloon, “when the balloon goes up” is a weird expression I heard lately, perhaps 99 red ones? That was the 1980s, bounces on him, arise from the sea which in this case isn’t a metaphor.
Amazing, and I wish my screen wouldn’t flash at me whenever I write something about MIT or conspiracies or theories of kerning or when I quote the NY Times (which I very much like, just read about Google searches being “black-hat” stacked by J.C. Penney), or I put up one of my compositions or videos, or paintings/drawings especially, or comments about how I believe that, well, I leave that remark involving the words, not connected, alpha, www fora, trees, lights (what about xmas?), lyrics, books, and anything having a shred to do with anything I have been doing all my life, to which I have some propriety relationship: my ideas! My output! Is identity theft going on by proxy, by taking everything from me? By causing enough despair for me to willingly give things up? I think not. I don’t have fears, a strange brain-chemistry thing, oh very strange brain, oh very strange chemistry, che misterioso. Basically playing music, then composing it, analyzing it, teaching it including time and frequency domain, writing words of many means but nothing especially orthographic though I am font-obsessed and did have a Letraset font catalog which I read obsessively and it was just the alphabet! Mind you, for transfer-stencils, as a kid, and designed fonts at the age of 10, and was Greek/Norse/Egyptian myth-obsessed, and I had The World Atlas of Mysteries with an awful photo of Spontaneous Human Combustion leaving a Zimmer frame and shoe after the person immolated, I write about representation, I was involved in the editing of my ex-girlfriend Cammy Brothers’ dissertation and book on Renaissance architectural sketches of ruins and built/unbuilt works by the architects, and worked on formal music theory with the greatest modern music theorist David Lewin at Harvard where we spend half our time rotating and inverting and retrograding strings of notes, using Markov chains, infinite and finite string systems, dovetailing, counting intervals, duplicating notes as singularities (BEFORE the recent spate of them), and studying ways of understanding, semantically, difficult but seemingly obvious texts (and his book on the subject was published, finally, posthumously) and that involved excising parts of the music kind of hypermetrically in the sense, loosely speaking, of Cone, Lerdahl and Jackendoff (I am being very generalizing here), etc. I work on representation of transformational voice leading between two sets, basically a critique of current ideas on the subject, their metaphors, which makes the heating pipe very unhappy with me (yes, a metaphor, and metonymy and metaphor are major parts of my dissertation). I like everything to be in words. Able to be spoken, heard as-is.
So, yes, I do all this. And I am about to put up a couple of videos. I don’t know how well they will be received, but here goes nothing.
[The following from a good sort!]
Gypsy Wife
And where, where, where is my Gypsy wife tonight
I’ve heard all the wild reports, they can’t be right
But whose head is this she’s dancing with on the threshing floor
whose darkness deepens in her arms a little more
And where, where is my Gypsy wife tonight?
Where, where is my Gypsy wife tonight?
Ah the silver knives are flashing in the tired old cafe
A ghost climbs on the table in a bridal negligee
She says, “My body is the light, my body is the way”
I raise my arm against it all and I catch the bride’s bouquet
And where, where is my Gypsy wife tonight?...
Too early for the rainbow, too early for the dove
These are the final days, this is the darkness, this is the flood
And there is no man or woman who can't be touched
But you who come between them will be judged
And where, where is my Gypsy wife tonight?...
—Leonard Cohen
Famous Blue Raincoat
It’s four in the morning, the end of December
I'm writing you now just to see if you’re better
New York is cold, but I like where I’m living
There’s music on Clinton Street all through the evening.
I hear that you’re building your little house deep in the desert
You’re living for nothing now, I hope you’re keeping some kind of record.
Yes, and Jane came by with a lock of your hair
She said that you gave it to her
That night that you planned to go clear
Did you ever go clear?
Ah, the last time we saw you you looked so much older
Your famous blue raincoat was torn at the shoulder
You’d been to the station to meet every train
And you came home without Lili Marlene
And you treated my woman to a flake of your life
And when she came back she was nobody’s wife.
Well I see you there with the rose in your teeth
One more thin gypsy thief
Well I see Jane’s awake—
She sends her regards.
And what can I tell you my brother, my killer
What can I possibly say?
I guess that I miss you, I guess I forgive you
I’m glad you stood in my way.
If you ever come by here, for Jane or for me
Your enemy is sleeping, and his woman is free.
Yes, and thanks, for the trouble you took from her eyes
I thought it was there for good so I never tried.
And Jane came by with a lock of your hair
She said that you gave it to her
That night that you planned to go clear
Sincerely, L. Cohen
—Leonard Cohen
._. ._. ._. ._. ._. ._. ._. ._. ._. ._. ._. ._. ._. ._. ._. ._. ._. ._. ._. ._. ._. ._. ._. ._. ._.
Those are amphibrachs. But feet. Meter.
Leonard Cohen’s own liner notes:–
I had a good raincoat then, a Burberry I got in London in 1959. Elizabeth thought I looked like a spider in it. That was probably why she wouldn’t go to Greece with me. It hung more heroically when I took out the lining, and achieved glory when the frayed sleeves were repaired with a little leather. Things were clear. I knew how to dress in those days. It was stolen from Marianne’s loft in New York sometime during the early seventies. I wasn't wearing it very much toward the end.
According to Wikipedia: In the 1999 book, The Complete Guide to the Music of Leonard Cohen, the authors comment that Cohen’s question, “Did you ever go clear?”, in the song, is a reference to the Scientology state of “Clear.” Cohen was very briefly a member of the Church of Scientology, which he had heard was a “good place to meet women.”
And, “why not?”
Check out www.songmeanings.net for some Revelations. [Bad guise!] Also find P’s “Wild-blue-inland-kid-intimacy” which is on one of our main blogs. [The words of a great man!] To swing the other way completely, read about what is accidentally celebrated (no, I mean wesentlich/Anfall, not zufällig) in Wikipedia, on the swastika. I simply cannot reproduce the postcard here because it is so vile, and freedom of speech referring to something before it apparently became evil and vile but with an implicit grope to it as there is in the article on eugenics, is not warranted other than for a reasonable rest.
This will continue later; I have a bACKlog of things to get through. SpAeter.
Sunday, February 6, 2011
Coded Crack.
Video*/images*/text(!)/sound © 2011 Peter Whincop
*including the weird shapes (like a cloud) that form, like people (attract according to Wiccans, which is pretty cool and better than opposites attract—I am genuinely impressed with everything I read about Wiccans) doing things (like, using the loo), structures (compositions by my friend Peter from the Netherlands for whom I wrote the MaxMSP patches for a couple), maps (the email address of my friend Peter from New Zealand), plots (of land for gardening, especially ones given to communities by local authorities), anything my wild crazy little inland empire can conjure (that doesn’t mean “with the law,” it means “sworn together,” as in a conspiracy, which is from “to breath together,” with a PIE base *(s)peis- “to blow”—cf. O.C.S. pisto “to play on the flute”), etc., more visible in the next video I put up. Part intention, and part intention-by-proxy, in that the wonderful bonus feature of the Mac rendering engine (probably QT—funny how that sounds like cutey—in this case 7 Pro) + iPhone and broken Macbook Pro screen made some of these shapes which I emphasized, and I decided to keep them, kind of like found art except someone also by intention fcuked—I am speculating, and this is of course only speculation and part of a fantastic nightmare—with these OS drivers and engines. Just a thought. Last time I went crazy and told someone brainy about it—and he almost developed the Unified Field Theorem a couple of decades ago, and that is independent of my madness—he said that I have to explain how it happened, not just observe that it happened, or so I claim. Hence, my semi-obsession which has yielded a pretty decent artistic output. So, the common factor is the OS. And my sleuthing. Thank god for the eh?! in sleuth, it points the way. I should meander restaurantwise, prey that eating fruit with aplomb and pears, apples, etc., de-hungers that aching gut. Stabbing sideache almost fcukked this slightly lonely victim (since surgery...).
And all because someone broke my little heart. Silly them for bothering to meet me. YEARS AGO. Anyway, it has been quite the favor to me in the LT (long term) [invariant? I think not]. And where I’m from, favours (yup, with the U—I think a U-bend is what Kiwis call an S-bend, for removal of sh!t etc.), are shared at will, and never negatively.
And also by exhaustion (... late) I am virtually prostrate.
Oh, and by the way, this is Peter walking through our apartment, talking about all the paintings and mess on the floor.
Saturday, January 29, 2011
Some of these words are duplicates.
The first of these is, like, words and pitchas, in our bedroom bookshelf. They are our main dissertation books, Peter’s main dissertation notes, books on music and philosophy that are okay—not rubbish but not living room material—some aesthetics and Marxist-aesthetics books, my currently-being-read books also -being-looked-into/at, blank books, my paper compositions, and a styrofoam bird that was once a symbol of much happiness not a cymbal of terrible clash.
The second is my most recent picture I have made a film of it on our Tumblr site. I have made some very odd stills as well. I explain it fully at Tumblr.
Why the two blogs? Hah! We have many. Tumblr and Blogspot, Bebo for photos, Weebly for a blah blah on Cavell, Nozick, Quine, and other Harvard philosophers, all on meaning and how we draw them from words: Must We Mean What Say of Stanley Cavell is our starting point. The heating system here is rattling angrily at me—there it goes again, saying “Peter” in its sultry tone, hair flicking back.
She was too perfect. Even the hair. Very sad. For her.
Flickr for photos (soon), Facebook for ignoring, Friendster for pretending to share certain politics, YouTube just to link to, LiveJournal just because we found it today, Scribd or something to put up poetry and that which resembles the poetry, and very very many more.
So why the __? They are IDs, as in, Identity Documents. An amazing friend from my (P) first two years as a Ph.D. candidate at Harvard, in 1996–1998, de Vie (she was Fleur de Vie Weinstock) was an undergrad, and went on to continue being a very wise (and fun) person, whose words I should have heeded, just a few words, “You’re like A**** in too many ways, you have to be careful.” And so I wasn’t. Very wasn’t. I almost died, too. de Vie has a poetry blog—a mailing list that I will find the (l)ink too. REMEMBER WHO YOU ARE is her most recently posted poem. Very important.
To remember who I am, it helps to leave a trace. More than a trace. That is more so that no prospectors can mud their way through the muck at the end of the mining of whatever is being mined. Some ore. I saw that being done in North Carolina, kind of a tourist trap. There was a cave too, and we went in without permission. And the fake whitewater rafting, training ground. And more. On that later.
Friday, January 28, 2011
Lost and Found. Rightful Owner Please Claim.
SO MY SOUL CAN SING
she is not able to lean
she could lie me flat
i never taught her
even that she needed
that teaching
fcuking thing or two
or many
and sweetly
face planting where i sat
and it left the smell
of me she never
said kept her close
because her words are
an eel
and then face planting
just trails this
with trash
all from an email there are many
and that was the sweetest
and most direct she was
she has a silken tongue
now she isnt like her
eel words
make from her a
scarf
with fiber reactive
some chemical
basic fixing
im just avoiding
saying dyeing
she has never touched
large breasts
we looked at them together
they would look strange apart
i thought we never
looked estranged
that were playing a game of the lion
punky or aslan
or whatever he was called
in the wizard of oz
where there is a little man
behind a screen
on some kind of machine
peddling
i never liked green
more coke thats no joke
poke veins that was not me
his wears the witch
and the wardrobe
should
no there is
are a few places
of ex
cision
this follows from the part
about the wizard of oz
where clothes are guarded
i think i can learn
from metric gashing
they were torn
and they were the
greek plural of hymen
long measure inside
your head job
was written for senior
house
over a year ago
it is techno
not mine
it is noise
mine
my greatgrandfather
and grandfather
we called him poppa
which is what dad is
now called
they were both mine
sweepers in two different
wars or their boats
were and they were
commodores
it plays tricks
it i have faith in
it can hurt the timpanum
just the right one
because i am not nasty
because it sucks draws
really hurts
thump okay that isnt so nice
once a lien is forced upon
my sister is a lawyer
and i imagine she is
a very good one just because
a property and there is
he is forced upon
would be knees but
no turning back
it is forfeit
youre damaged goods
and by you of youre
i dont mean you
a person
well barely
i mean the other
people you have
as friends or something
like that
you have crossed a lion
and you failed to
recognize the verb
i read in my
verlaine translation
zebraed
jen k and i loved
and the fake zebra
skin and canopy
were i think
perfect and well
timed and
jen m
is dream
other than
and perfect in fact honest
so not one just plu
perfect
since recently
i woke up
i cleft phalanx
behind and tainted
because how ever
could something
that has the trappings
of something attractive
and needed
and
it was my lien
i am alien
it was at me lying
onto them
me no
no lean
you dont go near poison
she has caused
damage
from bite
cold twice
nunce shy
because they play
golf on rooftops
she visited my
home and saw
the floodgates open
like bloodletting
from a liver problem
she opened those gates
she stood near the sulpheric
vents at the center
of my country
of my country
she courtesy raped
my parents and
my home
and my life
how to identify yourself
protect let yourself
be known everywhere
post mad
sui generis
everywhere
do not lie ever
let everyone you dont
know know you
then plans are like the
things that
are anonymous
infinity
and other
foiled again
she and therefore you
lied lied lied
that is three times
i really mean year
you dont toy with love
as fcuked up and lame as
that sounds
so the following holds
true in
that
i dont really like
fcuking if it is
more like its past tense
with with with the
to be thing in
front of it
then tortured
just a moment
that there are some things
agreeable
and as with property
contract other things
my sister talks about law
plots of land and
needs to be assessed
of course
it was
really flogging
a dead she aint what
she used to be
no she wasnt
then tortured
then hissed at
but i wasnt supposed to
know i found out
just like kenneth anger
and doris day
street car named
desire
whos afraid
careful with that
axiom person i forget
ultravixens and crapping on hitler in a bath
then they
or it her
lied cheated stole
charged threatened
and i am
am i i
asked anything
i think not
because ill let you
think my mind is wrecked
my mind is wrecked
no it isnt
i dont know kung fu
but im you know the line
the rest of it
i can write in many ways
and they all stare at you
to save you from
having to stare
and this part
is funny
when i would write
in front of people
who might have been hostile
or at least expert
dormant in some
i imagine latent
before i knew them
i wouldnt do it now
to two people and
they know who they are
not that that is
important
i like them
i like they are friends
and if they
it not bothers
me too
much even if they
do not like me
because wisdom doesnt
operating on a need
too
know laws and policy
helps
early letter
thank you for whatever reason
that
a strange phrase
or using funny strokes
and it would mean something
or not
and i would know which
but to see them
unpuzzle or try
was in the most
happy in
miserable days i have known
one of you dressed in very
naughty clothes
for three
i wasnt
weeks
it was a struggle
but so was
so was
was
because i was aware and
couldnt even muster
suicidal feelings
to see their faces
heads tilted with
that puzzle
meant to be left alone
and the eyes trying hard
not to be caught looking
and it still works
and it is like
the end of the great escape
when our hero is caught
by hearing the right
language when he should
have left it alone
it is funny how
people are really
very naked
naked
but those x ray glasses
sold for ten cents
in nineteen fifties comic books
take time to wear
but they work
and the moral of
this story is that this
story how
can i return to
anything
and how can i let
every detail
remain the same not
for me but just because
and how can
a thief liar cheat whore
which is a mythical
being and not possible
in the real world
therefore was not only
part of a nightmare
but the breeding horse
of dark hours
itself and there was
once a bag and she at
least pretended
well she did that
too well for
a long
time to like cats
but she is really
a dog
person i think
and through
extreme smugness
let that cat
right out of
that bag
it dint
come back the very next day
and nothing can stop us now
which was a cheap song of my
guilty pleasures she said she liked
and i am the only body she will know
and she will never leave me
we will be together for our whole lives
she loves my mind
and wonders what it would be like
to be inside of me
like my phrase to be alone
together and to rest her
head on my heart and to
fcuk me i think only
so i would pass out
except for those parvors
her blight i imagine
and says we are fully bonded
that we are inseparable
that she needs me
for her whole life and her only
genuine cry was when i was actually
leaving her for real
she doesnt know that
i was leaving her
for real that terrible may
ergo
her crocodile tears won the
wrong award which is quite funny
they were fake tears
you fcuking bitch arse cnut
and that it
took a lot to stay
but i chose
to overlook
discrepancies because
young people are supposed
to grow up and i was
evidently more than
willing to
wait when i first realized
she was a cheat and a liar
but she wasnt a liar
she was a lie
she was a lie
her legs parted easily
and her lips said come hither
but they never quite said
my name but guess who i
am
thinking of right now
god i am stupid
but love strikes
in the the same
place
burn an eyebrow
she was right
very right
and i am the body etc
and loves together lives
bonded whole inside nothing stop
but define the long measure inside
your head job
i think she is trapped there
until i die or go far away
and she needs me to be healthy
while my brain is her living space
i dont understand who she is
i know who she is
i dont understand what she is
why she lives in my head
i do not know what the real
person is then and why
and more why
sweetly so
was i raped like penetrated
but there is no withdrawal
and i will do everything
i can balance a lot
she must regret and hurt
she asks for human protection
she asks to be have
protection from humans
she is not real
even if somewhere she is
and i will never see that
monster horrific disgusting
i saw a photo of her cnut
in a very naughty pose
she who does not
pay rent but
asunder knows how deeply
and intensely
i wanted to vomit
seeing something so horrific
and that even a
photo of her
prettiness makes me
have to cover my eyes and agonize groan
very uncomfortably
even bite my piano muscle
joining my thumb to
my hand on the top
which would be partly
from masturbating
but you got the wrong hand
because i genuinely
cant stand the sight
of her and i hear
her voice when played
because i cannot see or
hear her in any memory
because she has faded
the good has faded
she is truly
adjective
abject
they havent invented it yet
but it will be short
with the only vowels
being faux and awkward
and lets just use schwars
and the consonants
grating and harsh
and not dwell on a word
for such an unworthy
cause of
so i understand little
behind the scenes
and how it is
connected to the sky and
to lights and ice
and twigs and the hairs
on my arms
and to faces and
things that
fascinate
but i am not gullible
doppelgänger
monstrosity
i am not
full of
foot
i dont need to ask about why
the latin word
verber
makes feedback
need some latin
it means lash as in
lash out not as
in eye lash
out
and i dont know why she needs
to extend her nerves
into my brain
or i am imagining this
or there is nothing in my head
because there is some fancy
research into tapping
into brains without
entering them
and so many ands
and i do not think
we hear about most research
and that is not because it
is sponsored by our government
think hard about that
which
and how strange is this
i am on their side
my former enemy
imperialism
because they rape and pillage
and are systematic abusers and
aggressors and racists and
so many other things
a reminder are you thinking of that that
but that is the nature of
the bourgeois beast
and who knows
i do
that one day things will be
different but not in this way
the writing is not on the wall
or books or in that way
but privately together
not by metaphor
or foraging
through
id say everything
but i have laryngitis
and here is the only
punctuation here
ripping that hymen
i mentioned before
because guess what
it was symbolic
and i always preferred
symbolic solutions in math
to number crunching:
the mark is a colon
because they are full
of sh!t
and the american government
and people did not plan
to be this way
as terrible as it is
and some are
in general
but these other people
who tortured me
though that is a small
part of their subterfuge
and the secular zion
with a bitter twisted
head though like a
rhizome or a
flat hierarchy
and they have ordained
themselves and are ordained
into things that they oppose
but are blind to it
rapists them all
face off like the movie
with somebody cage
and the scientologist
it might have been
someone else
this is all to say
they are truly planned
evil of evil
they know they know
they dont really comprehend
and are virtually
illiterate with very few
exceptions and
they struggle to gather
people who know
anything other than
their expertise
so i am blessed it seems
they flattered me
to be what they thought
was stupid
but
they are the smartest
of course and
soulless people
some have souls but are
masochist sadist amuck forth running bare
misled
bishopric
of course people are confused
or have been
even promoted even rewarded
by self importance by duty
or some other leverage
just as in the
dumbest parts of history
or the pawns
held tight to their
chests or underage
and how do cults
work
by communications of course
i think i know
because one especially
cultureless clueless
almost famed
one around here
for her virtues
as they are
and brilliance
makes me think of the
late 1970s and
i am your automatically lover
i am made from the cloth
i am maiden material
fabric
has doped my synaptic
band gaps
and i only semi
conduct myself
now but i am
so STRONG
iamFEAR
less
they plan they are revolting
it is essential
not accidental
if you didnt pick up
on it
that was quite philosophical
that you do not know
what is happening
which is kind of
what you collectively
which is one of the
many contradictions in
your coming
insidious
directionless
or just a utopian
teleology without
having chewed on
your fat
big ugly λόγος
or is it prosaic
logos
i sometimes forget
i am addressing
not murmuring
they do not know
i do not care
but they do not know
and all i want is
death of my current
brain derrangement
also their utter failure
but history is kind
so i die
or i dont
and i dont
care and IF
i live
then
words that continue
this diatribe
and those word
are
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







